Posts Tagged ‘West Virginia’

Bans on court use of sharia/international law: 33 bills in 20 states to start 2012; review of all efforts since 2010

January 30th, 2012

2012 marks the third year in a row to see major legislative efforts to ban state courts from using sharia or international law. A recap:

2010

Write up of all 2010 efforts here

2010 saw three efforts make their way out of their respective legislatures. The Oklahoma constitutional amendment would never take force, having been struck down by a federal district court, a determination upheld by the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in January 2012.

  • Louisiana HB 785 & SB 460: “Foreign law” means any law, rule, or legal code or system established and used or applied in a jurisdiction outside of the states or territories of the United States…A court, arbitrator, administrative agency, or other adjudicative, mediation, or enforcement authority shall not enforce a foreign law if doing so would violate a right guaranteed by the constitution of this state or of the United States.
  • Oklahoma HJR 1056 (Constitutional Amendment): Prohibits the courts to “look to the legal precepts of other nations or cultures. Specifically, the courts shall not consider Sharia Law or international law.” Requires courts adhere only to the U.S. & Oklahoma Constitutions, federal and state law and regulations, and where necessary the laws and regulations of another state.
  • Tennessee HB 3768 & SB 3740: Defines “law, legal code, or legal system” means a law, legal code, or legal system used or applied in any jurisdiction outside of Tennessee, including any foreign state, jurisdiction, country or territory of the United States…Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, and subject to provisions of superseding federal treaties, any otherwise enforceable contract which incorporates any substantive or procedural law, legal code or legal system of another state, foreign jurisdiction or foreign country that would violate rights and privileges granted under the United States or Tennessee Constitution is declared to be against public policy of this state and is unenforceable in this state.

2011

Write up of all 2011 efforts here

Despite having far more bills introduced in 2011 than in 2010, there was only one such piece of legislation enacted

  • Arizona HB 2064 Defines “foreign law” as “any law, rule or legal code or system other than the constitution, laws and ratified treaties of the united states and the territories of the united states, or the constitution and laws of this state….a court, arbitrator, administrative agency or other adjudicative, mediation or enforcement authority shall not enforce a foreign law if doing so would violate a right guaranteed by the constitution of this state or of the united states or conflict with the laws of the united states or of this state.”

2012

15 sharia/international law bans were carried over from the 2011 session. Combined with 18 newly introduced bills this puts the issue front and center for the 2012 sessions. Already there has been activity, with the Florida Senate Judiciary Committee giving its approval to a ban.

Full roster of 33 bills introduced in 2012 in 20 states and their statuses after the jump.

West Virginia considers creating an intermediate appellate court, Virginia considers getting rid of theirs

January 27th, 2012

Of the 50 U.S. states, 40 have an intermediate appellate court (IAC), generally (but not always) called the “Court of Appeals”. Two states have been actively trying to get their own IACs. The first, Nevada, has been trying for decades but has been unable to get voter support for a constitutional amendment to create or allow the legislature to create such a court.  A fourth attempt is currently in the works.

The other state is West Virginia. Creation of an IAC (tentatively entitled the “Intermediate Court of Appeals”) has bounced around the legislature since at least 1999 (HB 3008 of 1999; HB 200B of Second Special Session of 2003) but picked up a great deal of attention in 2010 (HB 3269; HB 4619; SB 589; SB 645) and 2011 (HB 3150; HB 3165) with the state’s senate approving one version (SB 307) that has been reintroduced as part of a larger “Civil Justice Reform Act” in 2012 (SB 420). Under this bill,  “all appeals shall be reviewed and a written decision on the merits issued by either the Supreme Court or Intermediate Court as a matter of right except for [certain appeals as specified in statute]…”

Meanwhile, in the name of cost savings, the Commonwealth of Virginia is considering abolishing their IAC. Under SB 630 the current Court of Appeals would end effective October 2012. According to the blog of the Virginia Lawyers’ Weekly, the change would keep the current judges in their respective offices until the end of their terms, but with no apparent work to do after October of this year. The prime sponsor told the VLW Blog “when the state is cutting services to children the judiciary ought not be immune from the budget ax” and criticized the court for having in his view few if any judges with experience in criminal, domestic or workers compensation practice prior to selection to the court.

Will West Virginia magistrate court judges have to possess a college degree?

January 23rd, 2012

West Virginia is one of only a few states which has a Magistrate’s Court with judicial officers named Magistrates (as opposed to many states in which magistrates are quasi- or subordinate judicial officers appointed by judges).

Current West Virginia law (§50-1-4) requires only that those seeking to be elected a Magistrate Judge have “a high school education or its equivalent.”

Several attempts have been made in the last three years to increase that minimum education requirement, with odds looking promising for 2012.

In 2009, HB 2840 and SB 609 would have required all magistrates have a baccalaureate degree from an accredited college or have four years of experience as a magistrate. Neither advanced out of committee.

In 2010, SB 495 repeated the 4-year-degree or 4-years-experience language of the 2009 bills and like them failed to advance. HB 4292 set a different standard and fared better. Under it, new magistrates would have to have a bachelor’s degree or two years’ experience. Those already holding office could remain as magistrates under the old high-school-only requirement. That plan advanced through the House but died in the Senate.

2011 saw a flurry of activity. The session started with a plan (HB 2540 and SB 195) to allow for three options for new magistrates:

  • A bachelor degree from an accredited college
  • An associate’s degree in criminal justice from an accredited college, or
  • A minimum of four years of experience as a magistrate

Current magistrates with only a high school education could remain in office. This plan met with Senate approval and House committee approval, but died on the House floor. Additionally, SB 412 added yet a fourth option: 10 years of certified experience as a law enforcement officer. It went nowhere.

Coming into 2012, SB 108 picks up where HB 2540 / SB 195 of 2011 left off and is currently assigned to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

West Virginia Interim Joint Standing Committee on the Judiciary meets December 12-14, will examine family law

December 13th, 2011

The West Virginia Legislature’s December interim meetings are being held this week, including the Joint Standing Committee on the Judiciary and its three subcommittees.

Topics to be discussed include:

December 12

Subcommittee C: Presentations of draft legislation relating to disability of elected officials & creation of the office of Lieutenant Governor

Subcommittee A: Public Safety and Offender Accountability Act

December 13

Subcommittee B: Family Law

December 14

Subcommittee C: Deer Farming

Full Committee: Reports of the subcommittees, plus construction of correctional facility & bill relating to rule-making process

Bans on court use of sharia/international law: Pennsylvania bill introduced

November 28th, 2011

Welcome New York Times readers!

Welcome Post-Gazette readers!

Since the last update of this list in October, one piece of legislation has been introduced.  Pennsylvania’s HB 2029 bans court references to any “foreign legal code or system” if doing so would impair constitutional rights.

Full roster of 2010 bills are available. 2011 and 2012 bills after the jump. » Read more: Bans on court use of sharia/international law: Pennsylvania bill introduced

West Virginia Interim Joint Standing Committee on the Judiciary met November 14-16

November 16th, 2011

The West Virginia Legislature’s November interim meetings were held this week, including the Joint Standing Committee on the Judiciary and its three subcommittees.

Topics discussed included:

November 14

Subcommittee C: Presentations of draft legislation relating to disability of elected officials & creation of the office of Lieutenant Governor

Subcommittee B: Bullying

November 15

Subcommittee C: Discussion and further consideration of draft legislation relating to the rule-making process

Subcommittee A: Unknown (no online agenda)

November 16

Full Committee: Reports of the subcommittees

West Virginia Interim Joint Standing Committee on the Judiciary meets October 11-13

October 11th, 2011

The West Virginia Legislature’s October  interim meetings are being held this week, including the Joint Standing Committee on the Judiciary and its three subcommittees. Topics to be discussed include:

October 11

Subcommittee C (morning): Discussion of possible revision to rule-making as it pertains to WV Department of Health and Human Resources

Subcommittee C (afternoon): Presentation of draft legislation relating to autism

October 12

Subcommittee A: Recommendations relating to substance abuse; interstate group that the Controlled Substance Monitoring Program has joined

Subcommittee B: Bullying and NJ Bullying Bill of Rights

October 13

Full Committee: Reports of the subcommittees

Bans on court use of sharia/international law: list of all bills since 2010, new 2011 Michigan bill, first 2012 bill prefiled

October 3rd, 2011

This post has been updated. Click here.

Since the last update of this list in August, two pieces of legislation have been introduced. Michigan’s SB 701 appears to be the Senate version of HB 4769, which has gone nowhere since its June introduction.

The other bill is Alabama SB 33 of 2012, a prefiled bill for the next session. SB 33 of 2012 is a constitutional amendment that looks more like HB 607 / SB 61 than HB 597 / SB 62 in that it does not specifically mention “sharia”.

It should be noted that at least some 2011 bills will make a return in 2012; roughly half of states allow bills to be “carried over” from one session to the next. Definitive answers as to which bills will return will be available as the legislatures come back into session in January.

Full roster of bills going back to 2010 after the jump.
» Read more: Bans on court use of sharia/international law: list of all bills since 2010, new 2011 Michigan bill, first 2012 bill prefiled

2011 South-Atlantic indigent defense legislation

September 13th, 2011

Law

Florida HB 7067 / SB 1016 / SB 7018 Re-creates Indigent Civil Defense Trust Fund within Justice Administrative Commission without modification. Repeals provisions that would have terminated the trust fund in 2012. (see also HB 7065 / SB 1014 / SB 7016)

Florida HB 443 / HB 7199 / SB 170 Requires that each public defender implement a system to electronically file court documents with the clerk of the court. Requires Florida Public Defender Association report to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives by a specified date on the progress made in implementing the electronic filing system.

Georgia HB 238 Reconstitutes and vacates all currently serving members of the Georgia Public Defender Standards Council. Provides for appointing new members. Alters powers and duties of the council and council director, council’s responsibility to set policy and standards, and the director’s responsibility to develop rules and regulations to efficiently administer the provisions of the law related to public defenders. Provides director to appoint circuit public defenders and requires two-thirds vote of council to remove the chairperson of the council or to overturn the director’s decision regarding the removal of a circuit public defender. Requires certain annual reports be prepared by the director, rather than the council, and a copy sent to the Supreme Court.  Changes provisions relating to the circuit public defender supervisory panel. Changes provisions relating to appointing attorneys in conflict of interest cases.

Maryland SB 515 Specifies that an individual whose assets and net annual income are less than 100% of the federal poverty guidelines may be determined eligible for services from the Office of the Public Defender (OPD) without an assessment. Clarifies that the District Court, a Circuit Court, and the Court of Special Appeals are prohibited from appointing an attorney through OPD to represent an indigent individual if (1) there is a conflict in legal representation in a matter involving multiple defendants and one of the defendants is being represented by or through OPD; or (2) OPD declines to provide representation to an indigent individual entitled to representation.

North Carolina HB 243 Provides fee charged by clerk for certificates under seal is waived for appointed attorneys representing indigent clients.

Virginia SB 902 Permits retired justices or judges to appear as counsel in cases in courts of the Commonwealth if (i) the retired justice or judge has been retired for at least two years and is not authorized for temporary recall by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, (ii) the retired justice or judge is appearing as counsel, pro bono, for an indigent person in a civil matter, (iii) such civil matter is assigned or referred to the retired justice or judge by a nonprofit legal aid program organized under the auspices of the Virginia State Bar, and (iv) the retired justice or judge is not an employee, officer, or board member of such nonprofit legal aid program.

Active/Carried over into 2012

Georgia HB 648 Implements HR 977 (Constitutional Amendment). Creates trust fund for indigent defense dollars collected by clerks. Provides and specifies certain fees and assessments are dedicated to funding legal services for indigent persons accused of crimes and delinquent acts. Provides such funds are to be remitted to the Georgia Public Defender Standards Council.

Georgia HB 977 (Constitutional Amendment) Creates trust fund for indigent defense dollars collected by clerks. Provides and specifies certain fees and assessments are dedicated to funding legal services for indigent persons accused of crimes and delinquent acts.

Approved by one chamber

West Virginia HB 3067 / SB 549 Increases certain civil filings fees currently collected by circuit courts, and impose a new docketing fee for unspecified civil appeals including family court appeals but not including Workers’ Comp cases or, presumably, actions in the Supreme Courts original jurisdiction, to be collected by the Court and paid, at its discretion, to either Legal Aid of West Virginia (LAWV) or into the Interest on Lawyer’s Trust Accounts (IOLTA) fund. Approved by full House, died in Senate Finance Committee.

West Virginia SB 568 Clarifies that an attorney from the public defender office shall be appointed by a judge in all cases where an attorney-at-law is required to be appointed for an eligible client. Approved by full Senate, died in House Judiciary Committee.

West Virginia SCR 79 Requests Joint Committee on Government and Finance study need for authorizing executive director of Public Defender Services control over public defender corporations. Approved by full Senate, died in House.

Died in committee

North Carolina SB 596 Expands state’s office of public defender system to every county in state. Realigns public defender districts accordingly.

Virginia HB 1570 / SB 908 Increases from $10 to $14 fee on most civil actions filed in trial courts to pay for free civil legal representation provided for the poor by a nonprofit legal aid program organized under the auspices of the Virginia State Bar. Changes from $9 to $13 the amount that, from such additional fee, is to be credited to the Virginia State Bar’s Legal Aid Services Fund.

West Virginia SB 482 Requires public defender corporations of all the judicial circuits to be centralized under the executive director of Public Defender Services and grants executive director rulemaking authority.

West Virginia Interim Joint Standing Committee on the Judiciary meets September 12-14

September 9th, 2011

The West Virginia Legislature’s September interim meetings are being held next week, including the Joint Standing Committee on the Judiciary and its three subcommittees. Topics to be discussed include:

September 12

Subcommittee A: Prison overcrowding

Subcommittee C: Draft legislation relating to gubernatorial succession

September 13

Subcommittee A: Prison overcrowding, with Administrator of the Supreme Court Steve Canterbury

Subcommittee B: HB 2755, Relating to Mentally Ill Persons (provides that the President of the West Virginia Sheriffs’ Association, along with the Supreme Court of Appeals and the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Resources shall develop and propose a statewide system for evaluation and adjudication of mental hygiene petitions.)

Subcommittee C: Draft legislation relating to the rule-making process

September 14

Full Committee: Reports of the subcommittees