Posts Tagged ‘Washington’

Washington State Senate to look at mandatory judicial retirement bills January 11

January 9th, 2012

Washington State’s Senate will meet January 11 to examine the issue of judicial retirement. Several bills are up to amend or end the current practice of forcing judges to retire at the end of the calendar year they turn 75:

 

Could only Washington State’s District Court judges get an extension of their mandatory retirement age?

December 21st, 2011

Over the last several years Washington State has seen several efforts to raise or eliminate the mandatory retirement ages for the state’s judiciary. Of the state’s five types of court, only the mandatory retirement age of the state’s Supreme Court and Superior Court are constitutionally established and would thus require an amendment to Art. IV, Sec. 3(a) to alter. That constitutional provision, added in the 1950s, requires Supreme and Superior Court judges retire at the end of the calendar year in which they reach 75 OR any earlier age set by the legislature.

Of the state’s remaining courts, the Court of Appeals and District Court have statutorily set mandatory retirement ages. For example RCW 3.74.030 sets the mandatory retirement for District Court judge. Interestingly, there does not appear to be a mandatory retirement age for municipal court judges.

Previous efforts (HB 1522 of 2007, HB 2489 of 2009, HB 1201 of 2011, and SB 5147 of 2011) had packaged the increase for the retirement ages for District Court judges with those for the Supreme and Superior Courts and were therefore contingent of passage of a constitutional amendment.

Enter SB 6025 of 2012. This bill, prefiled last week, affects only District Court judges and RCW 3.74.030, specifying that District Judges could serve until the end of the term in which they turn 75. It is expected to go to the Senate Judiciary Committee when the Washington legislature comes back into session January 9.

Washington Special Session Judiciary Committees meeting this week, will consider race and state’s criminal justice system

December 12th, 2011

Washington State’s Special Session continues apace this week. The House Judiciary Committee meets on December 12 to consider  HB 2163, making imperative changes to the foreclosure fairness act to ensure mediators’ participation. Its Senate counterpart is expected to meet twice; December 13 to hear a report on race and Washington’s criminal justice system and December 15 to consider SB 5055, regulating the notice of appointment of a personal representative in probate proceedings.

Washington Special Session Senate Judiciary Committee meeting December 6 & 8

December 6th, 2011

On December 6, Washington State’s Senate Judiciary Committee will consider legislation

  • Revising Powers of the Attorney General [S-3163.1].
  • SSB 5310 – Concerning false claims against the government.

On December 8, the same committee will meet to for possible executive action (i.e. votes) on bills previously heard in committee.

Special/Interim Judiciary Committee meetings in Illinois, North Carolina, Washington

November 28th, 2011

This week promises to be busy for legislators as Special and Interim Sessions are being held in Illinois, North Carolina, and Washington.

The Illinois House’s Judiciary II – Criminal Law Committee meets December 1 to examine overcrowding in prisons.

In NC, the Senate Judiciary I committee meets today (November 28) to debate changes to the state’s No Discriminatory Purpose in Death Penalty Act that allow the introduction of certain statistical evidence to show discrimination in either pretrial or posttrial proceedings in capital cases.

Washington State’s Senate Judiciary Committee will consider draft legislation on “Protection of public policy” on November 29.  On December 1 the same committee will consider bills on

  • Bail and pretrial release practices
  • Consular Notification
  • County Coroners

On December 2, it is the House Judiciary’s turn to meet. That committee will look at

  • Child Support Schedule Work Group Report and Recommendations
  • Uniform Collaborative Law Act
  • Legislation authorizing qui tam actions as part of a state Medicaid Fraud False Claims Act

Ohio Issue 1: What other states tried to increase or remove their judicial retirement ages and how did they do?

October 27th, 2011

Ohio voters will head to the polls November 8 to decide the fate of Issue 1, marking the sixth time in 20 years the question of judicial retirement has been on the ballot (Hawaii 2006; Louisiana 1995 & 2003; Pennsylvania 2001; Texas 2007; Vermont 2002), with 4 victories to 2 defeats.

Four legislatures have adopted statutes to alter retirement (Indiana 2011; Kansas 2003 & 2010; North Carolina 1992; Vermont 2003). Moreover, Arizona has advanced a proposed change for the 2012 ballot while New York voters will probably address the issue in 2014. This marks a trend over the last several year in particular of state legislatures confronting judges living longer and the question of whether there should be any limits on service at all.

State by state breakdown below the fold.

» Read more: Ohio Issue 1: What other states tried to increase or remove their judicial retirement ages and how did they do?

Washington House Interim Judiciary Committee meets today, will examine immigration services and assistance

October 4th, 2011

The Washington House Interim Judiciary Committee has issued its agenda for today’s meeting. On that agenda:

  • Self-Defense Reimbursement Statute
  • Wrongful Conviction Compensation
  • Briefing and discussion of Government liability and risk management practices
  • Immigration Services and Assistance

Should Washington State Municipal Court Judges be elected or appointed by the municipal government?

September 23rd, 2011

In her January 12, 2011 State of the Judiciary Address, Washington State Chief Justice Barbara Madsen elaborated on her concerns regarding the practice in the state of municipalities appointing municipal court judges, suggesting that perhaps election would be preferable and help protect municipal court judges from being pressured to rule in favor of the municipality or to find people guilty in order to balance local budgets.

Shortly thereafter, SB 5630 was introduced, to make all municipal court judges elected by their respective localities. A hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee was held on February 18. Video of the hearing is below. For those not wanting to watch all 40 minutes of video, a summary of the testimony can be found here.

Speakers (in order of appearance):

Panel 1: Juliana Roe, Senate Judiciary committee staff; Chief Justice Barbara Madsen, Washington State Supreme Court

Panel 2: Doug Haake, former municipal court judge for City of Bonney Lake; Chief Judge Stephen Brown, District and Municipal Court Judges Association

Panel 3: Candice Bock, Association of Washington Cities; Jim Haggerton, City of Tukwila; Diane Suprey, City of Sumner

 

2011 Western indigent defense legislation

September 16th, 2011

Law

Arizona HB 2377 Continues the State Capital Postconviction Public Defender Office until July 1, 2016.

California AB 118 Defines public safety programs, including public defenders, as local responsibilities. Creates Local Revenue Fund 2011 with District Attorney and Public Defender Account.

Hawaii SB 1073 Increases the amount of the indigent legal services fee surcharge on court filing fees in civil actions. January  2012: trial level – $10 to $35; appellate courts – $25 to $50.  January 2014: trial level – $35 to $50; appellate courts – $50 to $65. Requires Hawaii Justice Foundation to review, on a biennial basis, whether the Indigent Legal Assistance Fund is meeting the civil legal needs of indigent persons, and report its findings.

Idaho SB 1048 Allows governor to select anyone, subject to senate confirmation, to serve as State Appellate Public Defender (currently, may only chose from list submitted by panel consisting of bar president, chairs of Senate and House judiciary committees, appointee of governor and, ex-officio, the chief justice). (see also SB 1117)

Montana HB 96 Allows state public defender to recover costs in cases involving involuntary commitment of a developmentally disabled person when the respondent is determined to have the financial ability to pay for a public defender and a judge orders payment.

Montana HB 97 Transfers supervision of Office of Appellate Defender from Chief Public Defender to Public Defender Commission.

Montana SB 187 Provides if the defendant desires assigned counsel because of financial inability to retain private counsel and the offense charged is a misdemeanor and incarceration is a sentencing option if the defendant is convicted, during the initial appearance the court may order that incarceration not be exercised as a sentencing option if the defendant is convicted. Further provides if the court so orders, the court shall inform the defendant that the assistance of counsel at public expense through the office of state public defender is not available and that time will be given to consult with an attorney before a plea is entered. Further provides if incarceration is waived as a sentencing option, a public defender may not be assigned.” Increases amount of fee to be paid by defendant for representation to various amounts depending on case outcome and severity of crime. Provides, during application and at other points in time, court advise defendant is subject to criminal charges for any false statement made regarding their finances, ability to pay, etc. on the financial statement. Requiring defendant sign affidavit and specifies affidavit must include statement regarding perjury and possible criminal prosecution for false statements regarding finances. Adds as a purpose of state public defender commission “ensure that clients of the statewide public defender system pay reasonable costs for services provided by the system based on the clients’ financial ability to pay”. Requires commission establish and oversee a conflicts office with a conflicts manager responsible for conflicts of interest and for ensuring that cases involving a conflict of interest are handled according to professional ethical standards. Provides new staff positions for the public defender commission may be added only when the public defender account received sufficient revenue pursuant maintain a balance in the account that would sustain any staff position approved by the commission for at least 1 year. Ends requirement that chief public defender serve as secretary to commission. Provides neither the chief public defender nor the chief contract manager may not maintain a client caseload. Requires commission limit number of contract attorneys so they may be meaningfully evaluated and requires commission establish biennial reviews.  Provides contract attorneys may not take any money or benefit from an appointed client or from anyone for the benefit of the appointed client.

Nevada AB 259 Authorizes certain fees to be charged and collected in civil actions be used to support legal services for the indigent in counties whose population is less than 100,000.  Provides in counties over 100,000, $10 of certain fees related to transfer of cases between courts, must be submitted to a program for legal services for the operation of programs for the indigent. Provides $5 collected at the time of recording a notice of default and election to sell must be submitted to a program for legal services for the operation of programs for the indigent.

Oregon HB 2710 Establishes Legal Aid Account in General Fund and directs state court administrator as to funding and distribution of account funds.

Utah HB 272 Requires the court, when making a determination of indigency for a defendant. consider the reasonableness of the fees and expenses charge by privately retained defense counsel.

Approved by one chamber

California AB 259 Allows the appointment to the office of public defender 1) a sitting or retired judge, and as a judge meets specified qualifications, or 2) a judicial commissioner, magistrate, or referee, or elected public official meeting specified qualifications.

Idaho HB 300 Establishes an Access to Justice Fund in the state treasury to assist Idaho Legal Aid Services in providing free legal representation for indigent persons in civil matters and to meet the costs of maintaining the operation of ILAS.  Provides for $10 fee on most civil cases filed in state to pay for Fund.

Nevada SB 26 Provides standards for determining whether the parent or guardian of a child for whom the juvenile court has appointed an attorney is  required to pay for such legal representation or reimburse the county or State for such legal representation.

Died in committee

Arizona HB 2375 Makes an assault on a public defender an aggravated assault.

Hawaii HB 1381 Increases the surcharges on court filing fees in civil actions used to fund indigent legal services : trial level – $10 to $35; appellate courts- $25 to $65.

Montana SB 147 Allows public defender access to jailed persons prior to court appointment.

Nevada AB 49 Establishes the Fund for Legal Defense of Indigent Persons and authorizes certain counties to apply to the Board of Trustees of the Fund for reimbursement of certain extraordinary costs of providing public defender services. Provides for additional administrative assessments or increase is existing assessments for guilty pleas in misdemeanors and in other instances to pay for Fund. Imposes additional sales and use tax and authorizes county commissioners to impose an additional sales and use tax for legal services to indigent persons.

Nevada AB 520 Requires all the compensation and expenses of a court-appointed attorney to be paid from the treasury of the county in which a court appointed the attorney.

Nevada SB 123 Moves Office of State Public Defender  from Department of Health and Human Services to the Office of the Governor.

New Mexico SB 106 Removes Public Defender Department as administratively attached to the Department of Corrections, making it a “stand alone” “adjunct” agency.

State-by-State 2011 Legislative Year in Review: Washington

September 6th, 2011

New laws affecting the courts enacted or adopted by the Washington legislature in 2011 include the following:

HB 1041 Permits correctional personnel and community corrections officers who have completed government sponsored law enforcement firearms training to possess  weapons in court facilities.

HB 1371 Transfers most functions of the Sentencing Guidelines Commission to the Department of Corrections and the Administrative Office of the Courts.

HB 1794 Increases penalties for assaults on court-related employees, including judicial officers, court-related employees, county clerks, and county clerk employees.

SB 5023 Requests Supreme Court’s Practice of Law Board to evaluate (1) the specific services non-attorneys may provide to immigrants that do not rise to the level of the practice of law; (2) the level of access to those services and quality of those services; and (3) the level of need for non-legal services compared to legal services in immigration matters.  Provides a report of the Board’s findings and recommendations must be submitted to the Legislature by December 1, 2011.

SB 5423 Provides Administrative Office of the Courts must send billing statements for legal financial obligations periodically rather than monthly to those convicted of a crime. Provides county clerk has the same authority as the Department of Corrections to issue an order to withhold and deliver property for the collection of legal financial obligations.

SB 5941 Removes expiration date for various court surcharges. Provides revenue from the surcharges is to be split equally between the state and the county collecting the fee.