Posts Tagged ‘Kentucky’

New public financing systems for judicial elections to be considered in Kentucky, Ohio & Wisconsin

January 18th, 2012

While much of the election focus for the 2012 will be on the Presidential races, numerous states will be electing members to the courts. At least three state legislatures are considering joining (and in the case of Wisconsin, rejoining) the list of states that allow for public financing of at least some of those judicial races.

I’ve mentioned Kentucky’s unique position: in 2014 the entire judiciary (save one or two judges) will be on the ballot. Over the last several years members of the state’s legislature have proposed public financing for the races, delivering speeches on the subject during the interim and trying to gather support.  A 2012 version (HB 230) specifies the funding would come from state tax refund designations made on tax forms and by permitting (but not requiring) bar members contribute via their bar dues.

Wisconsin had a public financing system for its supreme court races but it was zeroed out in the latest budget. A new plan, one that would include most state-level elected officials, was introduced in Fall 2011. Under AB 317 and SB 213 taxpayers could designate $1 of their state income taxes to an Election Campaign Fund. Whatever funds are in the Fund would be all that was available for that particular election year(s).

Ohio’s HB 413 focuses on creation of a public financing program for supreme court races only in that state, but does include a trigger provision allowing for expansion to include races for court of appeals if the fund ever reaches $6 million. Funding would come from a designation of tax refunds on tax forms.

Kentucky State of the Judiciary: implementation of HB 463, need for new statewide case management system

December 12th, 2011

The National Center for State Courts has an archive of 2011, 2010, and previous years State of the Judiciary addresses located here.

In what will in all likelihood be the last State of the Judiciary address delivered to a legislature or legislative body in 2011, Chief Justice John Minton, Jr. gave the Kentucky State of the Judiciary address on Friday, December 9th to that state’s Interim Joint Committee on the Judiciary.

Highlights of the Chief Justice’s speech (full text here) included:

In many states, the Chief Justice annually delivers a state of the judiciary address to a joint session of the legislature. That is not our custom in the Commonwealth, but it is becoming a regular occurrence that I appear before the Interim Joint Committee on Judiciary to provide a state of the judiciary report.

I am pleased and honored by your invitation. I continue to believe that my being here is important for two reasons. First, this is a practical way to highlight important issues that are of particular interest to the courts that administer justice across the Commonwealth each day. I hope to accomplish that task over the next few minutes. More importantly, a formal report to you from the Chief Justice helps to make the point, however slightly, that our constitution has established the judiciary as a co-equal and independent branch of state government.

House Bill 463
I’ll begin with our accomplishments, the most striking of which is a success we all share. All three branches of government came together in a bipartisan effort to take the most comprehensive look at Kentucky’s criminal justice system since the enactment of the state’s penal code more than 30 years ago…This legislation, while timely and progressive, has required fundamental culture changes in
the courts. In addition to the courts, the law enforcement communities, social service agencies and the practicing bar all have been required to overhaul processes that have been in place for decades. That degree of change comes at a heavy price and I commend all involved for having the will to support this important shift in public policy.

Jefferson County District Court Reorganization
For the first time since the creation of the unified Kentucky Court of Justice in the 1970s, Jefferson District Court changed its business model to alleviate court overcrowding, reduce wait times for court hearings, enhance judicial accountability, better balance the court’s dockets, and provide greater continuity between judges and cases.

New Uniform Family Law Rules
Previously there were no statewide rules specifically for family law cases. Judges followed the Supreme Court Civil Rules and created local family law rules for their jurisdiction. It wasn’t unusual for attorneys serving several different counties to follow multiple sets of family rules. The new Family Court Rules of Procedures and Practice are based on best practices in
domestic and child welfare cases in Kentucky courts.

Best Practices/Model Court Initiative
This initiative is overseen by the Department of Family and Juvenile Services of the Administrative Office of the Courts and calls for the courts to work with community partners to address issues that will improve the outcomes for abused and neglected children and their families.

eWarrants
Through a collaboration between the Attorney General’s office and Administrative Office of the Courts, the Kentucky State Police, the Kentucky Office of Homeland Security and Open Portal Solutions Inc., eWarrants is operating in 113 counties and serving 90 percent of Kentucky’s population. The goal is to have 120 counties on board by the end of 2011.

Jury Management Program
One of the ways the court system is using resources more wisely is by automating and centralizing functions that must be performed in all 120 counties. A good example is our Jury Management 2.1 system, which now operates in every county. Jury Management 2.1 is a uniform jury program that allows a county to request jury panels.

Day on the Bench
In an effort to help legislators understand the impact courts have on the daily lives of citizens, we’ve started a program called Day on the Bench.

Redistricting of Supreme Court Districts
Recognizing that our seven Supreme Court districts have not been redistricted in more than 20 years and that the 2010 census data showed significant population deviation in at least three of our seven districts, the Supreme Court accepted Speaker Stumbo’s invitation to submit a plan to realign our districts.

Senior Status Program
As many of you are aware, entrance into the Senior Status Program for Special Judges sunset on January 31, 2009…We will be returning to a system of using active and retired judges to cover dockets when the regular judge is not available.

Kentucky Symposium on Court Funding
The University of Kentucky College of Law hosted a symposium on court funding in Lexington. Bar leaders, state chief justices, policymakers, national organization leaders and scholars discussed how severe reductions in funding are affecting the ability of the state courts to meet their constitutional function and provide access to justice.

Compensation Plan
My goal is to pay our workforce on a scale that is competitive with the rest of state government…In the upcoming session, I will ask for an appropriation that will allow us to implement the careful plan of the Compensation Commission to bring Judicial Branch salaries in line with the other two branches.

Case Management System
If equitable compensation for court personnel has reached a critical point, so too has our need for new technology. The centerpiece of our next budget is a request for an entirely new court case management system. This is the first time the Judicial Branch has requested funding for an IT project of this magnitude.

Pretrial Officers
As I noted earlier, House Bill 463 is having the intended effect of saving money by shifting state resources…This has caused a sharp spike in the workload for our pretrial officers, who supervise the individuals in diversion programs.

Judicial Form Retirement System
Many of you may not realize that funding for the Judicial Form Retirement System comes from the Judicial Branch budget. Historically, the judicial retirement system has operated with a solid financial record. However, the budget passed in the 2010 session was the first time the Judicial Form Retirement System was not fully funded.

Family Court Judgeships
The Supreme Court has identified the statewide implementation of Family Court as one of the needs facing the court system, but we recognize that some jurisdictions don’t have the caseload to justify another judgeship. We’re working through this issue to make sure there’s an equitable distribution of judicial resources across the state.

Judicial Centers
Finally, our budget request includes authorization for new judicial centers for Henry and Nicholas counties…Henry and Nicholas are the counties most urgently in need of new buildings.

Kentucky Chief Justice to testify to interim committee regarding state’s judiciary

December 5th, 2011

On December 9, the Kentucky legislature’s interim joint committee on the judiciary will meet. According to the committee’s agenda, Kentucky’s Chief Justice John D. Minton, Jr. is set to give the committee an update on the state’s judiciary (called the one Court of Justice under the state’s constitution and referred to as such in the agenda).

Kentucky and Nebraska Interim Judiciary Committees to meet

October 4th, 2011

Kentucky Interim Joint Committee on Judiciary will meet on October 7. On the agenda:

  • Unfair Competition in Kentucky Business
  • Illegal Methamphetamine Laboratories
  • Pill Mills
  • Medical Clinic Licensure
  • KASPER (Kentucky All Schedule Prescription Electronic Reporting)

On October 11, the Nebraska Senate’s interim Judiciary Committee will meet to examine two bills:

  • LR 254 Interim study to examine the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 and Nebraska’s Sex Offender Registration Act
  • LR249 Interim study to examine the impact of recidivism rates of persons convicted of driving under the influence

 

2011 Southern indigent defense legislation

September 14th, 2011

Law

Alabama HB 601 / SB 440 Repeals all existing laws with respect to indigent defense. Redefines “indigent defendant.” Provides for the unified administration of indigent defense services by the state. Ends practice of providing for indigent defense through the local presiding circuit judge, commission, or governing body administering the system. Creates statewide Office of Indigent Defense Services within the Finance Department and indigent defense advisory boards in each judicial circuit.

Arkansas HB 1004 Prohibits payment of attorney’s fees of privately retained attorneys for indigent persons.

Arkansas HB 2207 Provides funding for public defenders may come from a county’s administration of justice, general, public defender, indigent defense, or public defender investigator fund(s), or any other fund authorized by law for that purpose. Requires expenditures comply with an itemized, line-item budget.

Louisiana HB 178 Authorizes Dept. of Children and Family Services to transfer funds appropriated pursuant to existing law to unspecified entities for representation of children and indigent parents in child protection proceedings. Removes require that funds go only to those entities specified in existing law.

Mississippi HB 1302 / SB 2563 Consolidates Office of Capital Defense Counsel, Office of Indigent Appeals and Division of Public Defender Training into Office of State Public Defender. Repeals provision that Circuit Court may appoint local counsel in capital cases at the expense of the Capital Defense Counsel Special Fund.

Mississippi HB 506 Permits all public defenders to carry firearms in courthouses. (See also HB 881)

Mississippi HB 332 / SB 2697 Extends Public Defender Task Force until 2014.

Texas HB 1754 / SB 170 Creates within judicial branch the Texas Indigent Defense Commission. Transfers all powers and duties of Task Force on Indigent Defense  to Commission and abolishes Task Force. Designates Commission a permanent standing committee of the Texas Judicial Council and administratively attached to the Office of Court Administration, but provides commission is to prepare, approve, and submit a Legislative Appropriations Request and maintain a budget structure separate from that of OCA. Establishes membership of governing board of the Commission. Sets sunset date for commission as September 2023. Requires certain indigent defense information to be submitted by November 1st of each odd numbered year. Requires each law school receiving innocence project funding to submit annual reports regarding exonerations in criminal cases. Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure relating to the creation of public defender’s offices. Defines and authorizes local jurisdictions to establish managed assigned counsel programs as strictly a local option that would require both the judges and county commissioners court assent to implement. Repeals the “Indigent Representation Fund”, the court costs for which serve as a revenue stream to the Fair Defense Account, which serves the same purpose.

Texas HB 3323 / SB 1308 Allows for the review of attorneys who are no longer eligible to represent indigent defendants in capital cases due to a single finding of ineffective counsel. Provides determination will be made by the Regional Selection Committee, which includes an administrative law judge, a district judge, a representative from the local bar association, and a board-certified criminal attorney.

Adopted Resolution

Texas HCR 22 (Special Session) Commends the members of the Texas Supreme Court for their actions in support of legal aid services and honors them for their work in promoting access to justice for the state’s most vulnerable citizens.

Active/Carried over into 2012

Oklahoma SB 868 Specifies Indigent Defense System is only for indigents who are in custody. Provides a court may appoint legal representation for an indigent who is not in custody, in which case costs for such representation shall be paid from the local court fund.

Oklahoma HB 2175 Restricts use of the Oklahoma Indigent Defense System to defendants who are in custody. Provides a definition for “unable to employ counsel”.

Tennessee HB 1225 / SB 1279 Provides that if an attorney, post-conviction defender or district public defender in a criminal case is found to have provided ineffective assistance of counsel, that attorney cannot receive any further state funds for legal services until the attorney obtains continuing education, counseling or training that addresses the reason for the attorney being ineffective.

Tennessee HB 1623 / SB 1574 Removes the requirement that the Executive Director of the District Public Defenders Conference (DPDC) administer the accounts of the judicial branch of government relating to the DPDC; prepare, approve, and submit budget estimates and appropriations necessary for the maintenance and operation of the offices of district public defenders; approve all requisitions for the payment of public moneys appropriated for the maintenance and operation of the judicial branch of government; audit claims, and prepare vouchers for payment; and provide the district public defenders with minimum law libraries.

Approved by one chamber

Louisiana SB 270 Provides 10% of revenue generated from abandoned cars sold by court as result of littering conviction go toward indigent defender board. Approved by full Senate and House Natural Resources and Environment committee. Indefinitely postponed on House floor.

Mississippi SB 2945 Specifies public defender is authorized to assign the duties of all employees of the office without regard to the source of funding for those employees. Approved by full Senate, died in House Judiciary B committee.

Texas SB 1682 Authorizes the creation of a managed assigned counsel program by a locality with written approval of a judge of the juvenile court of a county or county court, statutory county court, or district court trying criminal cases. Approved by full Senate and House Criminal Jurisprudence committee. Died on House floor.

Died in committee

Arkansas HB 2146 Defines crime of “illegal disbursement of funds by a judge”. Makes illegal instances where judge makes payments for services rendered to a public defender, assistant public defender, prosecuting attorney, or deputy prosecuting attorney resulting from the exercise of that person’s official duties.

Arkansas SB 941 Provides public defenders must provide itemized bill with a detailed explanation of services rendered, time spent, and expenses incurred. Renames converts certificates of indigency into affidavits to be created by public defender commission. Increases from $100 to $250 maximum user fee payable to commission.

Arkansas SB 974 Designates public defender commission a criminal justice agency for purposes of access to the Arkansas Crime Information Center.

Mississippi HB 181 Sets hourly payment for indigent defense counsel as 80% of the hourly rate allowed in the Mississippi’s federal courts. Provides judge presiding in case may adjust the total requested payment to counsel in a case if the court finds that the number of hours claimed by counsel in that case is not reasonable.

Mississippi HB 153 Creates District Public Defender Pilot project.

Mississippi HB 978 Provides public defender salaries are to be same as county prosecutors.

Mississippi SB 2971 Authorizes loan forgiveness programs for education loans to encourage law students and other attorneys to choose careers in the area of public interest, including specifically public defenders and civil legal aid attorneys.

Texas HB 1475 Provides for longevity pay for assistant public defenders.

Texas HB 1392 Creates special $95 fee for sale of property at a foreclosure sale to pay for civil legal services to the indigent.

Texas HB 2174 / SB 726 Establishes judicial access and improvement account to provide funding for basic civil legal services, indigent defense, and judicial technical support through certain county service fees and court costs imposed to fund the account. (See also Special Session HB 34 / SB 23)

Texas HB 1918 / SB 1028 Requires a district court judge to appoint one attorney, rather than two, when a capital felony case is filed. Provides in cases where prosecutors do not seek the death penalty a second attorney will not be required to be appointed.

Interim committee activity in Kentucky, Virginia

September 13th, 2011

The Kentucky Joint Interim Judiciary Committee will meet September 14. On the agenda: arrest, prosecution, and treatment of juveniles under 10.

Virginia’s Committee on District Courts is set to meet jointly with the state’s Judicial Council on September 19 in Richmond. The Committee’s 14 members include 8 legislators, including the chairs of the Committees for Courts of Justice in the Senate and House of Delegates. The chairs also serve as members of the Council as well.

2011 Southern bail/pretrial release legislation

August 17th, 2011

Law

Alabama HB 56 Requires determination if defendant is unlawfully present in U.S. prior to bail determination and, if determined not lawfully present, denial of bail. (see also SB 256).

Kentucky HB 463 / SB 161 Establishes pretrial release and considerations for persons based on risk of flight and danger before trial and require credit toward bail based on time spent in jail before trial. Requires the Supreme Court to create guidelines for judges to use when considering pretrial release and monitored conditional release. Directs the courts to develop guidelines for pretrial release decision making, and directs judges to use these guidelines in making those decisions. Requires those on pretrial release to use GPS monitoring. Provides a maximum bail is not to exceed the amount of fine and court costs for specified crimes. Requires Department of Corrections to provide training on evidence-based practices to employees of pretrial services.

Louisiana HB 216 Provides failure to to make probable cause determination within 48 hours of arrest, resulting in release, does not preclude the defendant’s rearrest and resetting of bond for the same offense or offenses upon the issuance of an arrest warrant based upon a finding of probable cause by a magistrate.

Mississippi SB 2239 Clarifies that domestic violence bail bond fee is to be refunded to defendant who is not finally convicted.

Oklahoma HB 1347 Creates Wildlife Bail Procedure Act, setting procedures for persons arrested for violation of any section of the Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Code.

Tennessee HB 703 / SB 861 Directs that a defendant released on a pre-trial bond continue on release pending the trial under the same terms and conditions unless the court determines other terms and conditions or termination of the bond is necessary. Authorizes a court to revoke a defendant’s bond and order defendant held without bail pending trial if the defendant violates a release condition; is charged with an offense committed during release; or engages in conduct that obstructs the orderly and expeditious progress of the trial or other proceedings.

Tennessee HB 718 / SB 1269 Provides, in certain DUI-related cases,defendant may not be released with another bail “until the judge or judicial commissioner sets conditions on the bond to attempt to eliminate the danger posed by the defendant” instead of “unless the court first determines the defendant is no longer a danger to the community.”

Tennessee HB 962 / SB 802 Directs issuance of a capias warrant for a criminal defendant who forfeits bond. If circumstances require, authorizes use of a duplicate copy of the capias until a certified copy of the capias can be obtained from the clerk’s office.

Texas HB 1070 / SB 972 Allows a county jailer to take a defendant’s bail bond.

Texas HB 1658 Specifies that a defendant may be refunded a bail bond on order of the court and only after the defendant complies with the conditions of the bond.

Texas HB 1822 Specifically authorizes a partial release of security when the amount of security remaining would meet certain requirements.

Texas HB 1823 Harmonizes provisions related to bail bond business in Code of Criminal Procedure with related provisions under the Occupations Code.

Texas HB 3077 / SB 877 Requires a sheriff, prosecuting attorney, or clerk of the court to verify an affidavit from a surety stating the accused is in custody of another governmental entity before discharging the surety’s liability on a bail bond. Requires a sheriff to place a detainer on the accused and notify both appropriate officials in the jurisdiction in which the accused is incarcerated and the court or magistrate for which prosecution is pending. Requires magistrate then direct the court to issue a capias for the arrest of the accused if deemed necessary.

Introduced with committee and/or floor approval

Tennessee HB 1312 / SB 1862 Removes the requirement that a court determine whether a defendant is a danger to the community prior to releasing the defendant on bail for being charged with vehicular assault, vehicular homicide or driving under the influence.

Tennessee HB 1380 / SB 780 Specifies that when determining the amount of bail, if it is determined that the defendant is unlawfully present in the United States, then there would be a presumption that the defendant is a flight risk.

Texas HB 770 Enhances the penalty for bail jumping and failure to appear as a condition of being released from custody from a Class A misdemeanor to a felony of the first degree if the offense for which the actor’s appearance was required is an offense of murder or capital murder.

Texas HB 875 Requires the sheriff or other officer to notify the judge or magistrate authorized to grant or deny the defendant’s release on bail if the sheriff or officer determines that the defendant was not lawfully admitted to the United States or, although lawfully admitted, the defendant’s lawful status has expired. Requires the Commission on Jail Standards to prepare and issue guidelines and procedures to ensure compliance with these provisions. Establishes a rebuttable presumption at any proceeding before the judge or magistrate concerning the defendant’s release on bail that the defendant presents a risk of flight from prosecution if a sheriff or other officer notifies a judge or magistrate that a defendant was not lawfully admitted to the United States or that, although lawfully admitted, the defendant’s lawful status has expired.

Texas HB 1784 Allows a court to refund any cash funds to a defendant after the defendant complies with the bond conditions. Allows a defendant, as part of a plea bargain or deferred prosecution agreement, to request funds to be withheld for outstanding fines, court costs, or amounts of restitution, but not to repay attorney’s fees.

Texas HJR 86 (Constitutional Amendment) Denies bail to certain persons who are unlawfully present in the United States and are taken into custody for committing a felony.

Texas HJR 98 (Constitutional Amendment) Denies bail to certain persons charged with a violent or sexual offense after having been previously convicted of a violent or sexual offense.

Texas SB 878 Prohibits a court or a magistrate from authorizing a defendant to deposit cash less than the full amount of bail set by the court or magistrate, nor require money or other security as a condition of bond for release.

Introduced with committee rejection

Alabama HB 481 / SB 276 Requires as condition for bail after an arrest for a second or subsequent DUI violation that a defendant have an ignition interlock device installed.

Alabama SB 291 Requires as condition for bail after an arrest for DUI violation that a defendant have an ignition interlock device installed.

Tennessee HB 1501 / SB 1987 Makes a person who is charged with sexual exploitation of a minor ineligible for suspension of prosecution and pretrial diversion.

Texas HB 1686 Require a judge or magistrate in whose court a criminal action is pending to discharge a surety’s liability on a bail bond under the following conditions: the surety files with the judge or magistrate an affidavit stating that more than five years have elapsed since the date on which the surety posted the bond, that the surety no longer wishes to be a surety on the bond, and that the surety will give the prosecuting attorney notice of the affidavit; and the surety gives such notice of the affidavit to the prosecuting attorney. Requires a judge or magistrate who discharges a surety’s liability in that manner, if an indictment or information remains pending against the defendant, to issue a capias for the defendant.

Introduced with other or no activity

Alabama HB 481 Requires as condition for bail after an arrest for a second or subsequent DUI violation that a defendant have an ignition interlock device installed.

Arkansas HB 1245 Modifies existing law regarding issuance of warrants for failure to appear for those held on bond. Provides a judgment entered when the defendant has been surrendered, apprehended, or arrested within one hundred twenty (120) days of receipt of written notification to the surety of the defendant’s failure to appear is void.

Arkansas HB 1246 Permits financing of bail bonds.

Arkansas HB 2169 “Affirmatively clarifies” financing of bail bonds is prohibited.

Mississippi HB 54 Establishes rebuttable presumption defendant presents a risk of flight if not lawfully admitted to the United States.

Mississippi HB 1266 Imposes a 1% increase on fee charged for bail bonds to be deposited in the State Treasury for Department of Mental Health.

Mississippi HCR 14 Prohibits issuance of bail for sex offenses.

Mississippi SB 2474 Clarifies procedures by which ail is set by municipal court. Provides bail set is payable to municipality.

Mississippi SB 2505 In cases of domestic violence, requires Protective Order Registry be checked before granting bail on another charge.

Oklahoma SB 705 Changes numerous laws with respect to personal recognizance, forfeiture of bail, release on personal recognizance, posting bail, and suspension of driving privilege. Modifies certain arraignment requirements. Removes requirement for release on personal recognizance under specified circumstances.

Tennessee HB 1578 / SB 770 Specifies that when determining the amount of bail, if it is determined that the defendant is unlawfully present in the United States, then there would be a presumption that the defendant is a flight risk.

Texas HB 168 Requires that a bail bond state an expiration date of not later than the third anniversary of the date the principal signed the bond.

Texas HB 532 Establishes a rebuttable presumption at any proceeding before the judge or magistrate concerning the defendant’s release on bail that the defendant presents a risk of flight from prosecution if a sheriff or other officer notifies a judge or magistrate that a defendant was not lawfully admitted to the United States or that, although lawfully admitted, the defendant’s lawful status has expired.

Texas HB 2467 Authorizes a surety to relieve the surety of the surety’s undertaking by delivering an affidavit to the prosecuting attorney and the county court clerk stating that the accused is incarcerated, unless the accused is not a United States citizen and is unlawfully present in the United States.

Texas SB 881 Allows a defendant and a defendant’s sureties to be exonerated from liability upon forfeiture if before the final judgment, there was a death of the principal or the principal was deported from the United States.

Texas SB 909 Relating to the discharge of a surety’s liability on a bail bond in a criminal case.

State-by-State 2011 Legislative Year in Review: Kentucky

August 5th, 2011

New laws affecting the courts enacted by the Kentucky legislature in 2011 include the following:

HB 463 Provides Supreme Court of Kentucky shall administer the drug court programs in state and set guidelines for ordering pretrial release and monitored conditional release.

SB 108 Increases jurisdiction of District Court in civil cases from $4,000 to $5,000. Increases jurisdiction of small claims division of District Court from $1,500 to $2,500. Provides that cases in respective court(s) at time of adoption of law/increase to remain in same court.

SB 26 Provides for personal identification card for the homeless or those without a fixed permanent address. Provides $2 of the fee for the card is to go to the Administrative Office of the Courts for the hiring of additional deputy circuit court clerks.

Kentucky Interim Judiciary Committee to meet August 5

August 2nd, 2011

The Kentucky Joint Interim Judiciary Committee will meet this Friday to examine SB 22 of 2011, make assaulting a physician, physician’s assistant, nurse, nurse practitioner, certified registered nurse anesthetist, respiratory therapist, laboratory technician, radiology technician, or social worker providing services in the emergency room of a hospital a Class D felony and make a Class D felony making a terroristic threat against the individuals listed.

Interim committee activity in Kentucky, Washington

June 28th, 2011

Tomorrow, the Washington House Judiciary Committee will be meeting to discuss the Homeowners’ Associations and the Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act.

On July 1, the Kentucky’s interim Joint Judiciary Committee will look at

  • Programs for status offenders
  • Community based programs for assisting juvenile status offenders and public offenders
  • Court programs for juvenile status and public offenders, suggestions for statutory changes, presented by Patrick Yewell, Executive Director, Department of Family and Juvenile Services, Administrative Office of the Courts
  • Programs state agencies offer for status offenders, public offenders, and other children at risk
  • Review HB 123 of 2011 relating to status offenders
  • Review of Executive Order 20114-350 reorganizing the Justice and Public Safety Cabinet programs