Archive for the ‘State of the Judiciary’ category

After Kansas House declines to invite Chief Justice for state of the judiciary speech, House Dem wants a statute to require such an address

January 28th, 2013

I noted earlier in January that the Kansas legislature declined to invite the state’s chief justice to deliver a state of the judiciary address. Now HB 2040 of 2013 would in fact require such a speech be delivered, orally, at the start of every session.

First, some background.

Longtime readers of the blog may know I’ve tracked state of the judiciary addresses delivered to legislatures for a few years now, noting whether or not the speech was required by statute or constitutional provision. There are at least 3 such states that have specific language that is cited when the legislature makes the formal invitation to the state’s chief justice.

  • Iowa Code 602.1207: The chief justice shall communicate the condition of the judicial branch by message to each general assembly, and may recommend matters the chief justice deems appropriate.
  • Indiana Constitution Art. 7, Sec. 3: The Chief Justice shall have prepared and submit to the General Assembly regular reports on the condition of the courts and such other reports as may be requested.
  • Texas Government Code Section 21.004 Government Code: (a) At a convenient time at the commencement of each regular session of the legislature, the chief justice of the supreme court shall deliver a written or oral state of the judiciary message evaluating the accessibility of the courts to the citizens of the state and the future directions and needs of the courts of the state. (b) It is the intent of the legislature that the state of the judiciary message promote better understanding between the legislative and judicial branches of government and promote more efficient administration of justice in Texas.

Kansas HB 2040 would specify any report by the chief justice would have to be delivered, in person, to the legislature (legislative leaders in declining to invite the chief justice in 2013 suggested he just send a written report instead).

At the beginning of each regular session of the legislature, the chief justice shall have the responsibility for delivering an oral state of the judiciary address to the legislature evaluating affairs concerning the state of the judiciary, including accessibility of the courts to the citizens of this state, future needs of the courts of the state and any recommendations for addressing such affairs of the judiciary.

The same bill would also require the governor’s state of the state address be made orally to the legislature.

Given that the bill is authored by a Democrat in a chamber that is made up of 92 Republicans and 33 Democrats, it appears unlikely the bill will get out of the House Judiciary Committee.

North Dakota State of the Judiciary: “access to the courts and the ability to participate in one’s own case are key concepts in delivering justice”

January 23rd, 2013

The National Center for State Courts has an archive of current and prior State of the Judiciary addresses located here.

Chief Justice Gerald W. VandeWalle gave his State of the Judiciary to a joint session of the North Dakota legislature on January 9. No formal resolution appears to have been adopted, instead a motion was made on the floors to convene in joint session for the speech. See the respective House and Senate journals. The text of the speech is here. Here are some highlights:

I begin this State of the Judiciary by observing that access to the courts and the ability to participate in one’s own case are key concepts in delivering justice. We do not always meet that goal, but we remain intent on keeping open the window of opportunity for all who seek remedy in our courts. To that extent, I am pleased to report that for the most part the state of the North Dakota Judicial System is healthy.

Task Force To Study Racial and Ethnic Bias in the Courts

As our economy grows our population becomes more diversified. We need to be aware and understand what that means to the judicial system. We intend to keep working on this issue. The judicial branch has neither the power of the sword nor the purse but instead must rely on the respect of the people in order to carry out its duties. The trust of the people in our ability to run a fair and impartial court system is not just an ideal but a necessity for us to function as our Constitution envisions.

Mediation Program

Five years ago, we started a mediation pilot program to address the needs of families going through child custody proceedings…I am very pleased to report that our program is having the outcome we had hoped for. The evaluation found that the mediation process reduced the time to settlement by as much as 5 months in the Northwest Judicial District.

Parenting Coordinator Program

Where the Mediation Program is designed to assist parties early on in their case, the Parenting Coordinator Program is designed to assist parties after the parenting order is final.

Problem Solving Courts

We currently have juvenile drug courts in six locations and adult drug courts in four locations and are in the process of establishing a juvenile drug court to serve the Valley City and Jamestown region…Recently, many states have implemented Veterans Courts to help veterans in the justice system as a result of their service to our Country.

Technology

I am pleased to report that our case management system, Odyssey, is implemented, and after April 1 of this year, 2013, all documents filed after the initiating pleadings must be filed electronically except for documents filed by self-represented litigants and prisoners; after June 1 of this year, initiating pleadings must be filed electronically in civil, non-juvenile cases.

Rural Law Clerk ProgramRural counties in North Dakota are facing a crisis in access to legal services. Currently, there are 21 counties that have 3 or fewer attorneys. In 4 of those counties, there are no attorneys at all.

Citizen Access CoordinatorEvery year, more people come to court without an attorney either by choice or because they are unable to afford one…To confront this issue, we are proposing a new Citizen Access Coordinator position that will work under the auspices of the state law library. The Citizen Access Coordinator will be able to provide procedural advice and education to self-represented litigants. This in turn will help us to keep the wheels of justice turning.

Judicial Emergencies

Most of you may not be familiar with the details of the practice of law, but you are all familiar with the flooding issues that we have been dealing with in this state…We have dealt with extended courthouse closures twice in the past fifteen years… This is why we are submitting a bill that will grant the supreme court the authority to temporarily suspend statutes of limitation in an orderly manner in the event of a disaster.

Judges and Court Staff

Courts are vital to maintaining the infrastructure of our society. Although not always noticeable, it becomes more apparent in the face of a rapidly changing economic and social landscape…

So, how did we get in this situation? I described to you earlier the unification process. When we consolidated district and county courts, we were required by legislative mandate to reduce the number of judges. That number was arbitrarily set at 42.

We have before us a plan put forth by our Judicial Planning Commission to realign our district boundaries, but re-districting alone does not solve our judge shortage nor does it begin to address our staff shortage.
I quote one of our former supreme court justices, Justice Edward Engerud, who served from 1904 to 1907, when he said in 1906, “It is my belief that the people of the state desire to preserve the integrity and efficiency of the (supreme) court.” I believe the same can be said of North Dakotans today.

 

Kansas: CJ not invited to deliver state of the judiciary address, end to merit selection system introduced

January 14th, 2013

The first few weeks of the 2013 Kansas legislative session are already proving to be active ones and a harbinger for a hectic session.

In late December, the Speaker of the Kansas House indicated the Chief Justice would not be invited to deliver a state of the judiciary address in 2013.

In early January a lower Kansas state court enforcing a 2005 Kansas Supreme Court decision directing more state funding for schools ordered the state to spend$400 million more on education.

At almost the same time pressure was put on the state’s bar to change the way the merit selection system in the state worked. Currently 5 of the 9 members of the nominating commission are picked by the state’s lawyers.

I noted that the Kansas House Republicans in 2011 and 2012 used a series of parliamentary maneuvers to try and get the merit selection system ended for the state’s Court of Appeals (a statutory change). None succeeded, however now Republicans control super-majorities in both chambers plus the governorship, enough to pass a constitutional amendment if all GOP members approve it. Governor Brownback is likely to press for such changes after his picks for a Court of Appeals vacancy failed to be among the 3 names submitted by the merit selection commission in November 2012.

Last week the Kansas Bar agreed to a 4-5-6 plan: keep the merit selection system but provide the nominating commission would be made up 4 attorneys chosen by the state’s lawyers, 5 people chosen by the governor, and 6 by legislative leadership.

At almost the same moment the Bar approved the 4-5-6 plan, SB 8 and SCR 1601 were introduced ending merit selection and switching to a quasi-federal system.

Under the proposals (not yet available online at the legislature’s website) a commission on judicial qualifications made up of mostly non-lawyers and with no input by the state bar would vet individuals AFTER appointment (under the current merit system candidates are vetted BEFORE appointment and a list of names sent to the governor).

Interestingly, the governor would have NO appointment power over the commission: that power would be exercised by the speaker of the house (2 non-lawyer), the minority leader (1 non-lawyer), the state treasurer (1 non-lawyer), the chief justice (1 lawyer), the attorney general (1 lawyer) and a retired district judge chosen by the state’s prosecutors (1 lawyer, since all district judges must be attorneys).

The commission on judicial qualifications would review the appointee and make its recommendation to the Senate which would then have a set number of days to act or the appointment is deemed confirmed. Judges would remain subject to yes/no retention elections.

State of the Judiciary Addresses: 2013

January 14th, 2013

Gavel to Gavel focuses on legislation affecting the courts. Yet in many or most states (depending on year) the chief justice has the opportunity to come into the legislature or addresses legislative leaders directly in the form of State of the Judiciary Addresses. For the third year in a row, Gavel to Gavel the Blog will be tracking them with links to give some idea of what the chief justices are asking from the legislatures.

The National Center for State Courts has an archive of previous years State of the Judiciary addresses located here.

Guam State of the Judiciary: “One of the wisest investments of time and resources that our government can make is making our court system as hospitable and secure as possible”

July 30th, 2012

Guam’s Chief Justice, F. Philip Carbullido, delivered his 2012 State of the Judiciary Address on May 1, 2012 to the 31st Guam Legislature (Liheslaturan Guåhan).

Portions of the Chief Justice’s Address are below:

Preserving Our Mission, Protecting the Rule of Law: A fair, efficient, and fully functioning court system provides businesses with the necessary confidence to invest in an area, by ensuring that their investments are fully protected under the rule of law… The protection provided by the court system is what makes it possible for our citizens to innovate and enjoy the fruits of their labor, while protecting their rights and the rights of others; it is what attracts investors and it’s what gives our local people the security they need to venture into business in the hopes of growing our economy and improving their standard of living.

CMS: For the Judiciary, the new CMS means that we can more effectively allocate our workload and maintain the most efficient operation possible… The Judiciary is moving with the national trend of becoming a paper-on-demand court. As part of Phase II of our CMS, we will implement e-filing in the Superior Court – an option that, until now, has only been available in the Supreme Court.

Strategic Plan: The Judiciary’s Strategic Plan is our way forward, our blueprint for the next 3 – 5 years. It’s how we know where we need to be, and it’s the surest set of directions on how to get there… Many of our strategic projects are focused on solutions designed to address all issues of timeliness – from getting a case moved through the system more quickly, to decreasing the time it takes to complete routine court business.

Program Highlights: The Judiciary of Guam succeeds today because our extraordinary employees and community partners come together in productive ways to make our system of justice work better tomorrow than it does today … A staggering 9,294 cases were filed in the Superior Court in 2011, including 2,027 criminal Cases… I would be remiss if I did not mention our specialty courts and the judges and employees who staff these courts… By providing “wrap around services,” we are able to target the underlying problems that lead people into the criminal justice system.

Concluding Thoughts: The Judiciary of Guam serves a very important function in our community and we are committed to providing quality, reliable, and accessible justice to all Guam’s residents and businesses… We rely on the collective support of the Legislature and the Governor in order to continue fulfilling our mission, and to ensure that our justice system remains accessible, reliable, and stable. I am acutely aware – and very much appreciate – that funding is tight for everyone. But by design of our system of government, the people of Guam depend on you to provide. We rely on the collective support of the Legislature and the Governor in order to continue fulfilling our mission, and to ensure that our justice system remains accessible, reliable, and stable. I am acutely aware – and very much appreciate – that funding is tight for everyone. But by design of our system of government, the people of Guam depend on you to provide.

 

Kansas State of the Judiciary: “we ask to be free to exercise more of the flexibility practiced by today’s Kansas farmers and other business people.”

February 2nd, 2012

The National Center for State Courts has an archive of 2011, 2010, and previous years State of the Judiciary addresses located here.

Pursuant to HCR 5028 of 2012, the Kansas House and Senate met in joint session on January 18. Interestingly, and perhaps uniquely, the resolution called the joint session “for the purpose of hearing a message from the Supreme Court on the judicial branch of government”, and direct the House and Senate form a committee “to wait upon the Supreme Court Justices.” The chief justice was not specified by name or title.

It was however Chief Justice Lawton Nuss that delivered the address, much of which focused on a recent weighted caseload study conducted by the National Center for State Courts (full disclosure: Gavel to Gavel is a production of the National Center for State Courts).

Highlights of the Chief Justice’s speech (full text here) below the fold.

» Read more: Kansas State of the Judiciary: “we ask to be free to exercise more of the flexibility practiced by today’s Kansas farmers and other business people.”

South Dakota State of the Judiciary: “South Dakota, however, continues to weather the financial storm while still providing its citizens necessary access to its courts.”

January 26th, 2012

The National Center for State Courts has an archive of 2011, 2010, and previous years State of the Judiciary addresses located here.

Through an unnumbered report adopted by both the House and Senate, the South Dakota legislature met in joint session January 11 for the purposes of hearing the State of the Judiciary Address of Chief Justice David Gilbertson.

Highlights of the Chief Justice’s speech (full text here) below the fold.

» Read more: South Dakota State of the Judiciary: “South Dakota, however, continues to weather the financial storm while still providing its citizens necessary access to its courts.”

Indiana Chief Justice delivers his 25th and final State of the Judiciary

January 19th, 2012

The National Center for State Courts has an archive of 2011, 2010, and previous years State of the Judiciary addresses located here.

Chief Justice Randall Shepard delivered his 25th and final State of the Judiciary address last week. Chief Justice Shepard’s address is one of the only State of the Judiciary speeches in the nation to be constitutionally based (Art. 7, Sec 3)

The Chief Justice shall have prepared and submit to the General Assembly regular reports on the condition of the courts and such other reports as may be requested.

However unlike in recent years it does not appear a formal concurrent resolution inviting the Chief Justice to deliver it was adopted (compare HCR 1 of 2011, HCR 20 of 2010, HCR 5 of 2009, HCR 4 of 2008).

Highlights of the Chief Justice’s speech (full text here) below the jump

» Read more: Indiana Chief Justice delivers his 25th and final State of the Judiciary

Iowa State of the Judiciary: budget cut “undermines the public’s confidence in the reliability of our justice system and hinders the state in achieving its goal of a vibrant economy”

January 17th, 2012

The National Center for State Courts has an archive of 2011, 2010, and previous years State of the Judiciary addresses located here.

Chief Justice Mark Cady presented the State of the Judiciary on January 11 to a joint convention of the legislature pursuant to a resolution (HCR 102 of 2012) passed by both chambers. HCR 102 noted that the Chief Justice’s report is statutorily based. Iowa Code 602.1207 provides:

The chief justice shall communicate the condition of the judicial branch by message to each general assembly, and may recommend matters the chief justice deems appropriate.

Highlights of the Chief Justice’s speech (full text here) below the jump

» Read more: Iowa State of the Judiciary: budget cut “undermines the public’s confidence in the reliability of our justice system and hinders the state in achieving its goal of a vibrant economy”

State of the Judiciary Addresses: 2012

January 17th, 2012

Gavel to Gavel focuses on legislation affecting the courts. Yet in many or most states (depending on year) the chief justice has the opportunity to come into the legislature or addresses legislative leaders directly in the form of State of the Judiciary Addresses. For the second year in a row, Gavel to Gavel the Blog will be tracking them with links to give some idea of what the chief justices are asking from the legislatures.

The National Center for State Courts has an archive of 2011, 2010, and previous years State of the Judiciary addresses located here.