Comments on: Arizona Prop 115: A look at judicial terms in other states http://gaveltogavel.us/site/2012/08/22/arizona-prop-115-a-look-at-judicial-terms-in-other-states/ A review of state legislation affecting the courts. Sat, 18 May 2013 12:23:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Arizona Proposition 115: What courts/states have mandatory judicial retirement and at what age? » Gavel to Gavel http://gaveltogavel.us/site/2012/08/22/arizona-prop-115-a-look-at-judicial-terms-in-other-states/comment-page-1/#comment-30572 Arizona Proposition 115: What courts/states have mandatory judicial retirement and at what age? » Gavel to Gavel Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:06:58 +0000 http://gaveltogavel.us/site/?p=4964#comment-30572 [...] addition to extending most judicial terms to 8 years, Arizona’s Proposition 115 would also change the state’s mandatory judicial retirement [...]

]]> By: Missouri Amendment 3 & Arizona Prop 115: How many names get submitted to the governor in merit selection courts/states? » Gavel to Gavel http://gaveltogavel.us/site/2012/08/22/arizona-prop-115-a-look-at-judicial-terms-in-other-states/comment-page-1/#comment-29913 Missouri Amendment 3 & Arizona Prop 115: How many names get submitted to the governor in merit selection courts/states? » Gavel to Gavel Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:11:23 +0000 http://gaveltogavel.us/site/?p=4964#comment-29913 [...] As I noted in my first look at Prop 115, this amendment would change a litany of provisions related to the state’s judiciary. With respect to the number of names, it would expand it from at least 3 names to at least 8. There is a proviso allowing fewer than 8 names to be sent to the governor, but only if two-thirds of the nominating commission rejects enough candidate(s) that finding 8 names would be impossible. [...]

]]>