<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: South Carolina legislature overrides governor, allows CJ to set e-filing fees to pay for court technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gaveltogavel.us/site/2012/06/25/south-carolina-legislature-overrides-governor-allows-cj-to-set-e-filing-fees-to-pay-for-court-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gaveltogavel.us/site/2012/06/25/south-carolina-legislature-overrides-governor-allows-cj-to-set-e-filing-fees-to-pay-for-court-technology/</link>
	<description>A review of state legislation affecting the courts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:29:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: South Carolina Year in Review: Paying for court tech with a veto override, Judicial Council membership &#187; Gavel to Gavel</title>
		<link>http://gaveltogavel.us/site/2012/06/25/south-carolina-legislature-overrides-governor-allows-cj-to-set-e-filing-fees-to-pay-for-court-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-33876</link>
		<dc:creator>South Carolina Year in Review: Paying for court tech with a veto override, Judicial Council membership &#187; Gavel to Gavel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gaveltogavel.us/site/?p=4847#comment-33876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] HB 4821 Provides for fees and costs to be set for filing court documents by electronic means from an integrated electronic filing (e-filing) system owned and operated by the South Carolina Judicial Department in an amount set by the Chief Justice of the South Carolina Supreme Court. Provides all fees must be remitted to the South Carolina Judicial Department to be dedicated to the support of court technology. (Veto overridden, see details here) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] HB 4821 Provides for fees and costs to be set for filing court documents by electronic means from an integrated electronic filing (e-filing) system owned and operated by the South Carolina Judicial Department in an amount set by the Chief Justice of the South Carolina Supreme Court. Provides all fees must be remitted to the South Carolina Judicial Department to be dedicated to the support of court technology. (Veto overridden, see details here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NJ Governor vetoes bill to help pay for court technology &#38; indigent defense; becomes 2nd state governor to veto court technology bills this year &#187; Gavel to Gavel</title>
		<link>http://gaveltogavel.us/site/2012/06/25/south-carolina-legislature-overrides-governor-allows-cj-to-set-e-filing-fees-to-pay-for-court-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-30576</link>
		<dc:creator>NJ Governor vetoes bill to help pay for court technology &#38; indigent defense; becomes 2nd state governor to veto court technology bills this year &#187; Gavel to Gavel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 19:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gaveltogavel.us/site/?p=4847#comment-30576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Earlier this week NJ Governor Chris Christie&#8217;s veto of AB 763, a bill that would among other things raise various court fees to help pay for court technology, was delivered to the Assembly. The governor&#8217;s veto occurred in late June but wasn&#8217;t filed until July 30. The bill, as approved by the legislature, is similar to one vetoed by South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley earlier this year  and later overridden. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Earlier this week NJ Governor Chris Christie&#8217;s veto of AB 763, a bill that would among other things raise various court fees to help pay for court technology, was delivered to the Assembly. The governor&#8217;s veto occurred in late June but wasn&#8217;t filed until July 30. The bill, as approved by the legislature, is similar to one vetoed by South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley earlier this year  and later overridden. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
