<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Hampshire House Judiciary Committee to vote October 25 on changing judicial terms, selection &amp; expanding list of &#8220;impeachable offenses&#8221; against judges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gaveltogavel.us/site/2011/09/16/new-hampshire-house-judiciary-committee-to-vote-october-25-on-changing-judicial-terms-selection-expanding-list-of-impeachable-offenses-against-judges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gaveltogavel.us/site/2011/09/16/new-hampshire-house-judiciary-committee-to-vote-october-25-on-changing-judicial-terms-selection-expanding-list-of-impeachable-offenses-against-judges/</link>
	<description>A review of state legislation affecting the courts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:41:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florida Amendment 5 &#38; New Hampshire CACR 26: Giving legislatures more power over judicial rulemaking &#187; Gavel to Gavel</title>
		<link>http://gaveltogavel.us/site/2011/09/16/new-hampshire-house-judiciary-committee-to-vote-october-25-on-changing-judicial-terms-selection-expanding-list-of-impeachable-offenses-against-judges/comment-page-1/#comment-29999</link>
		<dc:creator>Florida Amendment 5 &#38; New Hampshire CACR 26: Giving legislatures more power over judicial rulemaking &#187; Gavel to Gavel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gaveltogavel.us/site/?p=2875#comment-29999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] by the state&#8217;s Supreme Court. This has not stopped several efforts (prior coverage here and here) by the legislature from attempting to unilaterally declare by resolution certain court rules [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by the state&#8217;s Supreme Court. This has not stopped several efforts (prior coverage here and here) by the legislature from attempting to unilaterally declare by resolution certain court rules [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
