Archive for June, 2011

Issue 5:26 is out

June 30th, 2011

Issue 5:26 (June 24) is here.

  • Senate committee approves increase to California’s small claims threshold
  • Flurry of activity in New York and Ohio on raising the mandatory retirement ages for judges
  • Changes to judicial retirement systems in New Hampshire and New Jersey approved
  • Rhode Island’s Senate approves changes to state’s merit selection system, while identical legislation stalls in the House
  • Louisiana’s House and Senate approve numerous requests for studies by or about the state’s courts
  • Wisconsin joins Tennessee in giving judges specific statutory permission to carry guns into courthouses in 2011

Connecticut Joint Judiciary Committee & Virginia’s Judicial Redistricting panel meet July 7

June 30th, 2011

The Connecticut Joint Judiciary Committee will be holding a Public Hearing July 7 to focus on the state’s judiciary’s procurement code (agenda here), something required under a law passed in 2007 that revised the way the entire state government handled contracts (SB 1600, Special September Session). The legislature gave itself and the judicial branch until February 2011 to come up with their own procurement codes (Sec. 4e-12)

(a) On or before February 1, 2011, the judicial branch and the legislative branch shall each prepare a procurement code applicable to contracting expenditures, including, but not limited to, expenditures: (1) Involving contracting and procurement processes for purchasing or leasing of supplies, materials or equipment, consultant or consultant services, personal service agreements or purchase of service agreements; and (2) relating to contracts for the renovation, alteration or repair of any judicial branch or legislative branch facility in accordance with section 4b-1.

On that same day, the Virginia Supreme Court panel studying proposed new judicial circuits and districts will hold its first public comment session (h/t Virginia Lawyer’s Weekly), with additional hearings set for July 11, 13, 14, 18 and 21.

Maine State of the Judiciary: “the nuts and bolts of delivering justice”

June 29th, 2011

The National Center for State Courts has an archive of 2011, 2010, and previous years State of the Judiciary addresses located here.

Chief Justice Leigh I. Saufley gave  the Maine State of the Judiciary on March 24. The Chief Justice’s speech was given to a Joint Convention of the House and Senate, with the state’s governor present, making Maine one of at least five states where all three branches were present for the state of the judiciary (the five where the Governor was identified by name were AlabamaNew Mexico, North Dakota, and Wyoming).

On March 24, the Senate adopted Senate Order 13

Ordered, that a message be sent to the House of Representatives proposing a Convention of the two branches of the Legislature be held at 11:00 this morning in the Hall of the House for the purpose of extending to the Honorable Leigh Ingalls Saufley, Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court, the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court, and members of the Judiciary, an invitation to attend and request the Chief Justice make such communication as pleases her.

Highlights of the the Chief Justice’s speech (full text here) included:

We are all charged with remembering that the very first purpose of Maine’s Constitution is “to establish justice.” The collegial and collaborative efforts of Maine’s separate branches of government have made all the difference in our capacity to establish justice during these last many hard economic years, and your attention to your constituents’ justice-related needs means that scarce resources are used for the very best value we can obtain.

INTRODUCTION

I must begin my presentation by reminding us all that the Maine Judicial Branch has been substantially underfunded for decades…But the fact remains that there are too few positions—far fewer positions as compared to other states—to complete the work before us. However, I am not going to dwell on these challenges today. Nor am I going to spend time today talking about some of the recent and most uplifting aspects of the delivery of justice, such as the improvements in Juvenile Justice, or the new evidence-based practices in criminal law that hold promise for reducing community risk and recidivism through focused interventions, such as mental health courts, drug courts, and improved monitoring capacities. Instead, I am going to take advantage of this 10th Anniversary of my presentations to you to talk about the nuts and bolts of delivering justice.

CONTEXT

In 1976, the 107th Maine Legislature took steps to create an administratively efficient court structure. In what was a visionary move, the Legislature consolidated all three components of the state court systems under one single administration, reducing duplication of staff and improving flexibility in the use of judicial resources. It is important to understand that many states have not yet completed that step, leaving State, County, and sometimes even municipal governments to pay for the overlapping costs of the courts.

A DECADE AGO

So, ten years ago when I first spoke to you from this podium, I set out several goals designed to take advantage of the efficient administrative structure of our State Courts, to consolidate further, and to make the system more responsive to the public’s changing needs. Among those goals were the following: First: Secure the Courts. At that time, we had no system of entry screening whatsoever. Second: Take advantage of the single administrative system to balance and improve the allocation of judicial resources to assure that priority cases, including those involving children, violence, and sexual assault were reached quickly and resolved more promptly. Third: Consistent with efforts to consolidate and streamline, address the aging and expensive infrastructure of Maine’s courthouses. Fourth: Make better use of technology to reduce staffing needs, improve record keeping, and provide much more prompt public service.

A DECADE OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS

In the last ten years, we have accomplished many of those goals. First, regarding security, we have worked consistently, some of you might say stubbornly, to improve safety in our courthouses, and with your help, we have made substantial progress. Second, regarding resource allocations, in 2003, the Judicial Resource Team, led by Justice Levy, created an entirely new approach to case management and scheduling…In the last several years, we have built on those lessons by further reengineering specific dockets.  Third, over the last ten years we set about to streamline the court’s infrastructure.  Our use of technology has also expanded substantially. Although we do not yet have electronic filing, which is one of our ultimate goals, we have achieved several major steps forward.

CURRENT STATUS

Looking back over these last ten years, we have worked hard to keep our eye on our goals and move forward, notwithstanding the resource limitations. Unfortunately, the challenges of understaffing have taken their toll on the public. The bottom line is that the limited number of staff and judges simply cannot do all of the work that is generated.

THE NEXT DECADE

As we move ahead, in addition to continued progress in security, technology, and consolidations, we will be focusing on several substantive areas that require attention.

  • Business Litigation One of our goals must be to provide better public service for our business communities. There are three areas that need help: Complex Claims…Small Claims… And third, we must simplify and reduce the costs for those civil cases that are too big to be filed as small claims, and not large enough to qualify for the complex Business and Consumer Docket.
  • Access to Justice One last cautionary note for the decade to come. We must all work to improve the availability of legal services for vulnerable Maine people who cannot afford an attorney when they are confronted with urgent legal problems including those involving their children, their homes, or, in the face of domestic violence, their very lives.

VISION

And so, as we prepare for progress, we must keep our eye on the very specific vision of justice we have set out for Maine. I’m going to take the last few minutes to describe some of our most important goals for the decade ahead.

  1. First, our court facilities will be physically accessible to everyone and will be safe from dangerous weapons.
  2. All cases will be heard promptly, because every case type is a priority for the people involved.
  3. Support for access to justice will be strong and deep.
  4. Jury trials will be readily accessible.
  5. Finally, electronic information systems will substantially improve public service.

WHAT YOU CAN DO TO HELP

  • First, support the Governor’s budget for the Judicial Branch.
  • Second, come to our courthouses, watch justice in action, and give us your Feedback.
  • And finally, if you find extra money, send it on to us. We promise to make the very best use of every dollar you find.

Oregon’s Senate approves constitutional amendment that allows judges to teach and to continue to serve as jurists

June 29th, 2011

Many, if not most, states have a constitutional prohibition on judges or other elected/appointed officials from also working for the government in some other capacity or serving in some other office. In Oregon, that’s Article III, Section 1

The powers of the Government shall be divided into three seperate [sic] departments, the Legislative, the Executive, including the administrative, and the Judicial; and no person charged with official duties under one of these departments, shall exercise any of the functions of another, except as in this Constitution expressly provided.

One such exemption was added in 1958 (Article XV, Section 8)

Notwithstanding the provisions of section 1 article III and section 10 article II [relating to legislators holding other office -BR] of the Constitution of the State of Oregon, a person employed by the State Board of Higher Education, a member of any school board or employee thereof, shall be eligible to a seat in the Legislative Assembly and such membership in the Legislative Assembly shall not prevent such person from being employed by the State Board of Higher Education or from being a member or employee of a school board.

SJR 14 of 2011, as amended would add a second exception to Article XV, Section 8 for judges

A person serving as a judge of any court of this state may be employed by the State Board of Higher Education or a school board for the purpose of teaching, and the employment does not prevent the person from serving as a judge.

The original SJR 14 included a provision allowing judges to be in the Oregon National Guard for purpose of performing military service, but was amended out in committee. The Senate approved the revised version unanimously on June 6, however the legislature could adjourn as early as tomorrow and it is unclear if the House will have any opportunity to take up the SJR.

Another last-minute committee hearing on Wisconsin legislation altering trial and appellate courts’ jurisdictions

June 28th, 2011

I mentioned at the start of June what appeared to be an effort to alter the Wisconsin courts’ jurisdictions as a result of suits over the recall/collective bargaining bill adopted earlier in the year.

The bill was added at the last minute (June 1) to the agenda for a June 2 hearing before the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations.

Another last-minute addition was done this week. According to the announcement for today’s Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations hearing,  SB 117 was added to the list of items to be heard on June 27, the day before the hearing. Video of the event will be posted here later today.

Interim committee activity in Kentucky, Washington

June 28th, 2011

Tomorrow, the Washington House Judiciary Committee will be meeting to discuss the Homeowners’ Associations and the Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act.

On July 1, the Kentucky’s interim Joint Judiciary Committee will look at

  • Programs for status offenders
  • Community based programs for assisting juvenile status offenders and public offenders
  • Court programs for juvenile status and public offenders, suggestions for statutory changes, presented by Patrick Yewell, Executive Director, Department of Family and Juvenile Services, Administrative Office of the Courts
  • Programs state agencies offer for status offenders, public offenders, and other children at risk
  • Review HB 123 of 2011 relating to status offenders
  • Review of Executive Order 20114-350 reorganizing the Justice and Public Safety Cabinet programs

A Gavel to Gavel first: Video Update!

June 28th, 2011

In a first for Gavel to Gavel, I am updating the blog with a video of legislative hearings related to just some of the bills I’ve been tracking in 2011. Hopefully this will be the first of many such efforts.

Let me know what you think.

Special Edition on public financing of judicial campaigns now out

June 27th, 2011

Earlier today the Supreme Court handed down its decision on Arizona’s public financing system in McComish v. Bennett and Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett. While Arizona’s system does not cover judges, in the years since the plaintiffs filed their initial lawsuit(s), several state legislatures (including Arizona’s) have looked to adopt or in fact have adopted such systems for judicial elections.

This special edition of Gavel to Gavel looks at such efforts and how far they have gotten.

Week Ahead: 6-27-11

June 27th, 2011

Legislatures Going Out of Session

Delaware 6/30/2011
Rhode Island 6/30/2011 (Estimated)
Oregon 6/30/2011 (Estimated)
New Hampshire 7/1/2011

Issue 5:25 is out

June 23rd, 2011

Issue 5:25 (June 17) is here.

  • Oregon’s Senate approves constitutional amendment that allows judges to teach and to continue to serve as jurists
  • Rhode Island governors may get more choices for judicial vacancies through the state’s merit selection system
  • California Senate committee approves legislation specifically authorizing veterans’ courts
  • Louisiana’s House and Senate debate several resolutions asking for judicial involvement in studies of court caseloads/jurisdictions, the state constitution, and families in need of services
  • New York’s Senate approves creation of new crimes of menacing, assault, and aggravated assault on a judge