<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public financing for WA Supreme Court races: On the way or out of the question?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gaveltogavel.us/site/2010/02/16/wa-public-financing-on-the-way-or-out-of-the-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gaveltogavel.us/site/2010/02/16/wa-public-financing-on-the-way-or-out-of-the-question/</link>
	<description>A review of state legislation affecting the courts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:09:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WA: Another try at public financing supreme court races &#187; Gavel to Gavel</title>
		<link>http://gaveltogavel.us/site/2010/02/16/wa-public-financing-on-the-way-or-out-of-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>WA: Another try at public financing supreme court races &#187; Gavel to Gavel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gaveltogavel.us/site/?p=203#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>[...] 2010, public financing for supreme court races appeared to be on its way to reality when it ran aground a procedural hurdle. The 2010 version would pay for the financing via a $3 fee on civil case filings, something that Lt. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2010, public financing for supreme court races appeared to be on its way to reality when it ran aground a procedural hurdle. The 2010 version would pay for the financing via a $3 fee on civil case filings, something that Lt. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

