A plan to require Colorado’s district judicial performance evaluation commissions interview prosecutors, defense attorneys, and the local bar was killed in committee earlier this week. Current law (C.R.S. 13-5.5-105(d)) provides each commission has a duty “To interview district and county court judges and other persons and accept information and documentation from interested persons” without specifying those “interested persons”.
Under HB 1069 the duty to interview would have been expanded to explicitly include “a representative of the district attorney, a representative of the state public defender, [and] a representative of the local bar association.” An additional provision would have required each of the three organizations/entities have 35 days warning prior to the interview and that a majority of the members of the district evaluation commission be present. The interview could not be substituted with a written document “without the consent of the invited party.”
- Previous Entry: Missouri: bill to compel state judges use original intent interpretation of federal constitution, retroactively nullify federal laws & court decisions out of Senate committee
- Next Entry: Ohio: Legislature approves overhaul of Court of Claims; two of nation’s 3 judicial Court of Claims revamped in last 6 months