As previously noted, Georgia’s Amendment 3 would give the legislature power over the state’s judicial disciplinary commission (called the Judicial Qualifications Commission) that few if any states grant to their legislature. Under the proposal and implementing legislation the legislature sets the membership of the JQC, something most states do not allow. Moreover, the plan calls for a majority of the new JQC to be picked by legislative leaders, something no other state (other the Virginia) allows to occur.
The third element in play is for all JQC members picked by the House/Senate leadership (4), the Governor (1), or the Supreme Court (2) to be subject to Senate confirmation.
Appointments to the Judicial Qualifications Commission shall be subject to confirmation by the Senate as provided for by general law.
Most states do not allow for any such confirmation votes. Only 15 states have such votes, in a 16th (Virginia) all members of the judicial disciplinary commission are picked by the legislature therefore a confirmation vote is redundant.
Moreover, where states do allow for legislative confirmation votes, they do not allow the legislature the power to reject those appointments made by the judiciary/judges. Only 1 state, Texas, allows that state’s senate the power to confirm, or conversely reject, appointments made by the judiciary.
In all other states the power to confirm is limited to picks made by the Governor, the state bar, or by legislative leaders themselves.
Details below the fold.
Continue reading Election 2016: Georgia Amendment 3 – Should the senate confirm picks to the judicial disciplinary commission? Most states say no. Only Texas lets senate reject picks made by judiciary itself.